THE EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT FOR ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE
Employee Engagement in different organizations
In today’s fast changing world employee well-being has become a critical concern for organizations. The level of an employee is committed to helping their organization to achieve organizational targets can be known as employee engagement. The way the employees think, feel, and act towards to achieve organizational targets have a greater impact to the overall organizational performance. Generally speaking, employee engagement is a workplace method designed to improve an employee’s feelings and emotional attachment to the company, their job duties, and position within the company. More than ever, employee engagement is a strategic business objective because engaged employees lead to long term employee retention, higher employee performance, improved quality of work and eventually organizational success. (Gubman, 2004) identifies employee engagement as an intense of organizational attachment.
Kahn’s Employee engagement theory
William Kahn's one of the first researchers to identify the concept of employee engagement. So, he identified three principle dimensions of employee engagement.
Meaningfulness – If the employee perceives that their work is meaningful they likely to be engaged and committed to the organization. When the employees feels like not meaningful, then they will be quickly burnout. As an example one of the Marketing Manager in a well reputed organization, though he receives number of opportunities to work in different organizations, due to the mental attachments he was stayed in the same organization, can be known as highly engaged.
Safety – The level of physical, emotional, and psychological safety that employee feels comfortable when they are taking risks. A low perception of safety can make employees feel disengagement. As an example one manager is always giving negative feedbacks about his organization to the employees. Due to that the employees may not feel enough safety inside the organization.
Availability – having the resources and support required to do the job well help employees to feel valued in their work. As an example in one of the private organization they recruited a well qualified accountant, they promised to pay a huge remuneration package but they have not provide any separate cabin to continue his works. Finally due to lack of resources he resigned from the job. So, we can conclude, the availability of resources may impact to the employee engagement.
Benefits of Employee Engagement
Productivity – when employees are engaged at work, they feel a connection with the company. They believe the work there doing is important and therefore work harder. The employee has positive feelings about the organization and advocates for it to another making way for potential employees and customers. ( Baumruk and Gorman, 2006)
2. Profitability – when productivity increases, the
profitability will automatically increases.
3. Employee Retention – when the employees feel appreciated
there will be very less opportunity for employee turnover.
4. Mental wellness – It is essential to minimize
stress and promote mental wellness. Then the employees will be more supportive.
5. Brand advocacy – if the employees are satisfied
with the organization they will boost our organization’s reputation.
6. Decreased absenteeism – If the employee is full
satisfied with the top management, middle management and bottom line
management, if they have freedom to work effiently, it helps to decrease the
absenteeism.
7. Satisfaction – the employees are feeling more
satisfied then they will do more for the organization.
8. Creativity – Employees looking for new
innovations to meet the deadlines to complete the project.
9. Recruitment – When majority of the existing employees are highly engaged and they have a positive impact then the employees may work with their full capacity. So we can reduce the indirect costs and interview time.

Application
Previously I worked for an international organization. The top management, peers all employees are highly attached to each other. Always the top management appreciate employees works and shows the correct path. There's very less possibility to make mistakes. Everybody is emotionally connected to each other. Most of the employees get good remuneration packages from other organizations. But no body likes to leave from the organization. Due to the positive vibe lots of people may look into work in this organization. Current employees believe its a golden opportunity to work here.
Conclusion
When we improve employee engagement in an organization, we can expect positive outcomes such as more profit, increased productivity, higher sales and ratings. Finally, we can conclude employee engagement has a positive relationship with organizational performance.
References
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Ten, B. L. L. (2012). Work engagement, performance, and active learning: The role of conscientiousness. Journal of Vocational Behavior
Brayfield, A. H., & Crockett, W. H. (1955). Employee attitudes and employee performance. Psychological, Bulletin
Gubman, E. (2004). From engagement to passion for work: The search for the mission person. Human Resource Planning


Comments
Your blog on William Kahn's dimensions of employee engagement provides valuable insights into this critical topic. You effectively highlight the importance of Meaningfulness, Safety, and Availability in fostering a highly engaged workforce. The real-world examples you included make these concepts relatable and easy to understand. It's clear that when employees find their work meaningful, feel safe, and have the necessary resources, they are more likely to remain committed and productive. Your comprehensive analysis and practical examples make this an excellent read for anyone looking to improve employee engagement within their organization.
Your blog on William Kahn's dimensions of employee engagement provides valuable insights into this critical topic. You effectively highlight the importance of Meaningfulness, Safety, and Availability in fostering a highly engaged workforce. The real-world examples you included make these concepts relatable and easy to understand. It's clear that when employees find their work meaningful, feel safe, and have the necessary resources, they are more likely to remain committed and productive. Your comprehensive analysis and practical examples make this an excellent read for anyone looking to improve employee engagement within their organization.
The three dimensions of employee engagement proposed by William Kahn - meaningfulness, safety, and availability - are particularly insightful in understanding the factors that contribute to employee engagement. The examples provided in the article illustrate how these dimensions can impact employee motivation and commitment.
The benefits of employee engagement are numerous, and the article does a great job of highlighting the positive outcomes that can be achieved through employee engagement. From increased productivity and profitability to brand advocacy and decreased absenteeism, the benefits are numerous.
I must say that the application example provided is particularly relatable and impressive. It's clear that the organization's commitment to employee engagement has created a positive work environment that fosters loyalty and motivation among employees.
Overall, I think this article provides valuable insights for HR professionals and managers looking to improve employee engagement in their organizations. The article's emphasis on the importance of creating a positive work environment, recognizing employee contributions, and providing resources and support are all crucial factors in driving employee engagement